Web Design site using heavily modified Aurora template
Posted 5 years 2 months ago
Hi Everyone,
We've recently re-launched our company website.
We're a Web Design company based in Australia. We experimented with flat design, incorporating graphical elements, flat blocks of colour and many different Gantry particles. We really wanted to show clients that a templated web design doesn't always mean it ends up looking like the original template.
We're super please with how it's turned out.
If you have a spare couple of minutes, take a look and let us know what you think.
Please search forums before posting. Please make sure your post includes the version of the CMS you are using and a link to the problem. Annotations on screenshots can also be helpful to explain problems/goals. Please use the "secure" tab for confidential information.
Re: Web Design site using heavily modified Aurora template
Posted 5 years 2 months ago
I was referring to the errors not the yellow warnings - but ignore them if you wish, I was just making a suggestion to improve your site.
Regards, Mark.
Please search forums before posting. Please make sure your post includes the version of the CMS you are using and a link to the problem. Annotations on screenshots can also be helpful to explain problems/goals. Please use the "secure" tab for confidential information.
Re: Web Design site using heavily modified Aurora template
Posted 5 years 2 months ago
I know - and I appreciate it - I was just being a cheeky bugger!
I am interested however, one error seems to be thrown from embedding a Google Map, and the other is from the subscription particle - I don't see how I could get around not using an iFrame for a Google map but the subscription particle error is interesting.
Will look into that further.
Good things come to those who wait - but it's only what's left over from those who don't
Re: Web Design site using heavily modified Aurora template
Posted 5 years 2 months ago
Using an Iframe is perfectly acceptable - it's the use of the "frameborder" attribute on that tag that is not.
I see you moved forward with the other error too now... but there's still a couple to address left and I don't think the issues are coming from RT code - but let me know if you think that they are.
Regards, Mark.
Please search forums before posting. Please make sure your post includes the version of the CMS you are using and a link to the problem. Annotations on screenshots can also be helpful to explain problems/goals. Please use the "secure" tab for confidential information.
The Google Map was easy, just removed the frameborder reference from the code (although I have to say I think it's silly Google adds this to their embed code if it's going to throw a w3c error??)
The Subscription particle was easy enough to fix, just tweaked some of the code in the override.
The one I don't really understand is the 'role' in the g-offcanvas-hide div. I gather this is to hide the mobile menu on desktop and larger screens. Would it be a simple case of adding
role="mobile-menu"
To the div?
I'm not overly familar with ARIA - that's why I pay for a template subscription!!!
Please search forums before posting. Please make sure your post includes the version of the CMS you are using and a link to the problem. Annotations on screenshots can also be helpful to explain problems/goals. Please use the "secure" tab for confidential information.